Week 14 wraps up with two teams vying for Wild Card Playoff spots! The Vikings head west to take on the red-hot Seahawks in a MNF Matchup!

My name is Josh Thomas, and I write the Chalk Donkey article for NFL VIPs as well as focusing on the showdown/single game and the Monday-Thursday on both sites. In this article I’ll break down how those showdown/single game slates are scored, differences between the sites in terms of scoring and roster construction, and strategy for how to attack these games for GPP and Cash. I’ll also provide my anticipated exposure percentages for players that are mass multi entering.

—–> Check out my Mon-Thur Slate Breakdown <—–

How Does Showdown/Single Game work?

Each site runs their contests a bit different but for the most part, they are very similar. You pick 6 players from the game (5 on Fanduel) and choose one to be your Captain (MVP on Fanduel) and that person scores 1.5x points than everyone else.

On Draftkings you can play QB, RB, WR, TE, K, and DEF while on Fanduel you can play QB, RB, WR, TE, K but no Defense.

Scoring is the same as normal NFL DFS contests. On DraftKings there is a full point for PPR and that makes pass catchers more valuable while you only get a half point on FanDuel.

You need at least one player from each team on your roster. So you can’t just load on say the Bengals tonight even though you might think they dominate, you need to run it back with at least one Ravens play. Optimally I like to build with 4 of one team and 2 of the other on DraftKings and 3 of one team and 2 of the other on Fanduel, though 4-1 seems to be pretty solid there as well.

Looking for a podcast to listen to on your way to work or while mowing the lawn? Check out our Podcast Page for some great listens from @ffootballgeek and @DFSnDonut

Join the DFS Army Today and gain access to the best content/tools/projections/coaching in the industry!

Slate Breakdown:

Week 14 wraps up with the Vikings heading west to take on Russell Wilson and the Seahawks. Both teams are in the playoff hunt and could use wins on Monday night to keep them alive.

The Vikings are 6-5-1 and the slight road dog here, while the Seahawks are 7-5. Both are currently in the playoffs as wildcards, but a win would help to solidify their positions.

The game total of 46 is fairly low and I think Vegas is giving these defenses too much credit and the offenses not enough.

Adam Thielen has shown that he is essentially match up proof at this point in the season. He’s only had 3 games of less than double-digit targets on the season and in two of those games, he went for over 25 DK points. Seattle is a middle of the road pass defense, particularly against #1’s and #2’s. Thielen likely will matchup against Shaquille Griffin in two wide receiver sets and Justin Coleman in three-receiver sets. Neither are particularly good. I think Thielen likely gets his regardless of how well Kirk Cousin’s plays

Thielen’s counterpart Stefon Diggs is also in play and brings a 30+ point upside, but can disappear at times. The matchup isn’t particularly tough, but if Kirk Cousins’ has a bad day then Diggs likely will as well. Making him a stack candidate in GPP only for me. Speaking of Cousin’s, he’s priced too cheap for his ceiling and while the floor is single digit points, I think he will come in underowned and he is a prime captain candidate on DK and MVP candidate on FD. If we like his weapons, we have to like Cousins too.

At TE, Kyle Rudolph has started to find himself more involved in the offense and I think on the road that Cousins will likely target him early and often. Seattle is middle of the road against TE’s and Rudolph’s price is nice given his invovlement and work load.

The Seahawks have been fairly good against the run, but the Vikings NEED to establish the run tonight. Yes, he is in a bit of a timeshare with Latavius Murray but it is 80/20 at best. The Vikings MUST establish the run if they want to win this game, and the hope is that Zimmer and DeFillipo have realized this by now as the rest of the world already has. Anytime Cousins has to throw the ball over 300 yards the Vikings lose. (This has actually happened in every game but one). He has been heavily involved in the passing game as well with 10 targets and 8 receptions against the Patriots last week. Combined with the safety he presents on this slate, Cook is the top option.

Russell Wilson has been one of the most incredibly efficient quarterbacks we’ve seen in the modern era of the NFL this year. He gets an extremely difficult matchup this week with the Vikings 8th ranked defense and is the second highest priced player on the slate. He is the safer of the two QB’s but I actually think his ceiling is a bit lower than Cousin’s just based on the weapons he has.

All Tyler Lockett does is catch long touchdown passes. Literally. That’s all he does. He will likely faceoff with Xavier Rhodes, but Rhodes has been able to be had the last few weeks with his lingering injuries and Lockett is one of my favorite WR’s on the slate. Doug Baldwin is a game-time decision and from what I’ve see is unlikely to play with a groin injury. If he’s out this should push more targets Lockett’s way but also brings David Moore into the conversation. Moore was shut out last week, but has been one of the most targeted Seahawks prior to that. He draws a good matchup with Trae Waynes on the outside and the price is juicy.

The RB situation with the Seahawks is one that is a bit murky with the injury to Rashaad Penny that seemingly popped up out of nowhere but Chris Carson has been the guy in this offense lately. He has shown great consistency the last few weeks with at least 13 DK Points and 13 Carries in each of the last three games and even got involved in the passing game with 3 receptions last time out. If Penny can’t go it should open up some snaps for Miek Davis and at his cheap price he’s worth a look.

The TE situation is also murky. Trying to figure out who is going to get the 2-3 receptions and maybe a red zone look is like trying to figure out what my wife wants for Christmas. Impossible. That being said, I do like Ed Dickson a bit more here as he played more snaps last week and ran twice as many routes as Nick Vannett though Vannett had the better stat line. At $400 on DK Dickson makes a viable punt if you need the salary savings, especially paired with Wilson.

Both Kickers are in play but I lean Sebastian Janikowski as he has been more consistent this year and the Vikings tend to hold teams to field goals. I don’t know why Minnesota can’t ever have a good kicker. It seems every year they get someone new in and he sucks, and then whoever they let go, goes somewhere else and is clutch. Case in point Dan Bailey being brought in this year for a struggling Daniel Carlson who went to Oakland and hasn’t missed.

Both defenses are also in play, but I think recency bias will come into play here. The Bears defense were the optimal captain on DK last night and players will remember that and over play/over own both of these defenses. While I like both to score some points, I won’t have any in the Captain slot tonight.

Final Prediction: Vikings 24-Seahawks 23

Showdown/Single Game Roster Construction:

NOTE: Charts are updated through Week 13 of Showdowns and Single Games. (61 Fanduel contests, 65 Draftkings contests) Week 14 will be updated after Monday Night Football. 

We are now 13 weeks into the 2018 NFL Season and have enough showdown/single game slates that we can take a look at the GPP winning rosters and see how those rosters were built and whether there is any sort of trend that we can see to help us build GPP winning rosters ourselves.

This year, I’ve broken down all the GPP winning lineups to that point on both FanDuel and Draftkings and I’ve updated that data for this week with all the games from week 10. As always we have to answer four questions when building our Single Game/Showdown rosters and this data can give us a huge edge when answering them. Those questions are:

1. Who is going to be your captain?
2. How many players from each team to do you want?
3. What positions should you play from each team?
4. Are you playing both, one, or no quarterback

Let’s take a look at each of these questions

Who is going to be your captain?

Previously, the thought was that you need to have the following positions your captain.

1. WR1 for the Favorite
2. WR1 for the Underdog
3. TE1 for the Favorite
4. TE2 for the Underdog

But after looking at the GPP winning rosters through 13 weeks on both sites what we found was this:

As you can see here that is not the case. On Fanduel its actually the opposite and we have another week of data that shows that QB or Running Back is clearly the play on Fanduel. All of the GPP winning running backs in that spot have been ELITE RB’s (Alvin Kamara, Todd Gurley, Saquon Barkley) so it’s worth noting that unless you have a situation like that, you might want to just stick with QB. Typically the QB will have the safest floor and even in situations like the Titans/Cowboys game where you have an ELITE player in Ezekiel Elliott in a smash spot against a weak defense and he underperforms and actually scores less than both QB’s.

We continue to expand our so we continue to expand the pool of players that are viable to be captains, at least on DK. During week 9 we had a WR 4 (Adam Humphries) be the optimal player in the captain spot. We have still not seen a Kicker in the captain spot yet this season.

There is a large spread on DK while its a little more tightly concentrated on FD. Typically you just want a RB/QB on FD while anything and everything besides Kicker is in play on DK.

The reason that Draftkings is more spread out is due to the 1.5x salary increase for the Captain position. There have been times when the highest scoring player on the slate wasn’t in the optimal captain slot because having another high scoring player there at a cheaper salary allowed the user to build a better lineup.

The average salary on Draftkings for the captain spot was $11,113 which is typically right around the 7th or 8th highest priced player. That lower priced player in the captain spot allowed those users to build better overall rosters. You obviously need to find the right lower priced player here, but it’s a strategy that should be utilized on Draftkings when possible.

Salary typically isn’t as big of a deal on Fanduel where you really just need the highest scoring player, regardless of salary. The only player that wasn’t in the top 4-5 of pricing that was in the optimal lineup as MVP was  Carlos Hyde, against the Jets.

Another interesting piece I found when looking at the rosters was how often the captain or MVP was on the winning team. Early on in the season, we saw that this chart was almost 50% of each, but lately, it’s been trending in the direction of about 2/3 of the MVP/Captain slot players were on the winning team. While we shouldn’t be afraid to roster someone who is a dog in the game in this spot, particularly QB’s who have to air it out in a comeback, it is important to note that as we get more data, its becoming clearer that playing a player who is likely to win in this spot is optimal.

Surprisingly, the captain’s spot containing the winner of the game was about equal on both sites at 70ish % of the time. As we saw above you want to pay down at the captain spot on DK, and for those cheaper WR’s to pay off they likely need to score a TD and be heavily involved. This number actually increased over the weekend, so when making decisions on the Captain spot on DK you may want to target a player from the team that is the favorite.

While the sample size is small, I think its very telling and should help us to build more optimal lineups, especially when doing MME. Given this information here is how I would break down my Captain/MVP exposure on both sites.

Draftkings: UPDATED 11/14/18 

WR: 30%

RB: 30% 

QB: 25% 

TE: 15%

DEF:  Rarely and only if the game total is very low or we have a QB prone to turnovers

Fanduel: UPDATED 11/14/18 

QB: 45% 

RB: 45% 

WR: 10% 

I’m not typically even going to mess with TE on Fanduel. You don’t need to save salary and its VERY rare that a TE is the highest scoring player in the game and I can only foresee one or two situations where this could even happen, though one is this week with Travis Kelce and the Chiefs.

How many players from each team do you want?

This was something that was really interesting to look at among the optimal lineups, at least on Draftkings where there are three options, but still good to know for Fanduel as well.

With only two options on Fanduel for how you want to construct your roster, a more balanced 3-2 roster was the optimal 70% of the time. The 4-1 rosters were games that were blowouts (For example, last week we had one 4-1 roster with the Saints/Eagles game a blowout.) and one game that had an insane comeback  So unless we have a game that looks to be a massive blowout, it appears that best way to approach roster construction on Fanduel would be a 3-2 split.

On Draftkings though, its a bit of a different story.  A 3-3 split or balanced lineup was dead even with 4-2. Both are viable in GPP and what I would tend to target the most. The 5-1 lineups were reserved for blowouts and interestingly enough they tend to roster Kickers which allows them to load up on studs elsewhere in their lineup. If you are expecting a blow out this looks to be a good strategy.

In the majority of game situations you are going to want to target a balanced lineup unless we see a blow out happening, and if that’s the case then looking at a kicker is an important piece to consider.

What positions/players should you play from each team?

What I found in my breakdown of all the winning gpp lineups was that no winner had the exact same roster construction in terms of position players. Obviously, we have a smaller sample size and at some point this year we may see a duplicate, but right now we haven’t had the exact same roster construction on either site.

Draftkings: 

Let’s look at the roster construction on Draftkings. Check out that QB number first…close to 100%. There was only one instance where a QB wasn’t used in the winning GPP lineup and that was in the very first game Thursday game of the year with the Falcons vs. Eagles. Other than that there has been at least one QB in a lineup if not two in every single game. QB’s are the easiest way to get points, but as we looked at earlier, for the most part, we want to roster them in the flex position as opposed the Captain spot. Its cost prohibitive to roster them there, but if you instill the strategy of using a lower priced player in that spot you can often roster two QB’s, or a QB and a high priced skill player.

Also, in every roster that had a QB there was a correlation play, with a WR, TE, or pass catching RB. Even when there were two QBs in a lineup there was at least one correlation play for each QB. No Naked QB strategy has worked to this point and while I don’t think we can say it never will, it’s a solid strategy to correlate your QB with a pass catcher just like in regular lineups.

RB1’s continue to be used at a high clip on Draftkings in the flex spot. They are typically priced below the WR’s unless you have a Todd Gurley or Ezekiel Elliott and they give you some roster flexibility. Of the running backs used in flex position on Draftkings they had some interesting splits. While one would think that majority of your RB’s taken are bell cows, but we see over 25% of the rosters containing an RB2 who is typically only a third down or change of pace back.

So what does that mean? The way I interpret it is that you shouldn’t be afraid to play a running back just because he isn’t necessarily a bell cow back, especially if he can catch passes. PPR is king on DraftKings and often those Non-Bellcow backs are ones that do catch passes and they are MUCH cheaper than their counterparts. That’s a prime situation to take advantage of. A non-bellcow back who catches 3-4 passes and is at a huge discount can make the rest of your lineup work by allowing you to target those higher priced players for the remaining spots. What we’ve really seen in the last two weeks is that these ‘non-bellcow’ backs are starting become featured either because of injury or game flow and are becoming viable captain plays based on the game script.

I was surprised to see that Defenses were used in these GPP winning lineups on Draftkings MUCH more than Kickers originally but now Kickers are starting to make a comeback and actually pulled ahead in Week 8. They are priced the same usually and while we consider the Kickers to have a bit safer floor, the defenses do have that GPP winning upside if they can get over 15ish points. Twice now a defense has been used in the Captain slot in a GPP winner. Don’t be afraid to play your defense against your captain though as that has been the GPP winner four times already this season (Most recently in Week 8 with the Saints against the Vikings). Defensive scoring is all about sacks and picks or defensive touchdown so a WR/TE scoring high doesn’t necessarily mean that a defense will score low. What I wouldn’t do is play a defense in a lineup with a QB as the Captain.

Fanduel:

As we move over to Fanduel we now have an entirely different strategy. What I found over there was that contrary to what we think might be the best play, double QB has only been in the winning lineup a few times.  This is mostly because it is cost prohibitive to do with often the two QB’s being the most expensive players on the board, but also because we don’t often see two Qb’s go off unless its a shootout.

QB’s when in winning lineups have had at least one correlation play as well on Fanduel similar to DK, and naked QB has not been in the winner yet.

Without the ability to play defenses on Fanduel we have seen kickers take a more prominent role in the roster construction and in fact they are now the highest played position in the flex spot. We haven’t had a double kicker GPP winner this past week. TE’s are priced down as well over here and we see them in the winning lineups at over 60% of the time.

The graph above shows how many points players scored relative to their salary for week 2 on Fanduel. What we find here is that paying down at the MVP spot rarely makes sense when there is no salary increase that comes with it like on DK.

A higher salary doesn’t always indicate that a player will score more points, but as you can see above it typically does mean that a player with a higher salary will outscore those lower than them, at least those significantly lower.

Another interesting thing from this graph was that while Andy Dalton, had a heck of a night in that game against Baltimore, he wasn’t in the optimal lineup at the Captain Slot because of AJ Green just barely squeaked by him. It should be noted though that AJ Green caught three touchdown passes to barely squeak by and had he not, Dalton would have been the clear MVP. Further solidifying my take that QB should be your main MVP play on Fanduel.

Are you going to play one, both, or no Qb’s?

As we saw above I think you should have a QB in every single lineup. On Draftkings a lineup without a QB has been the optimal only one time in 16 slates. On Fanduel its happened twice, but I still think there you are better off with one than without one. If you are making 150 lineups I think I would allocate about 5% of my lineups to having no QB but the odds are that the nuts will have a QB in it.

As far as both QB’s go, I think its site dependent. On Draftkings I’m ok with going double QB, as long as they are both in the flex spots and not in the MVP as we have shown that that is not optimal construction.

On Fanduel, because of the way the QB’s are priced, double QB has only been in the optimal lineup MUCH less than DK, and it happened in shootouts. If the Vegas total is over 50 then I’m going to be more apt to try to get double QB lineups in. Obviously, it’s an extreme case but the Chiefs/Rams game is a perfect example of a double QB game.

With the DS now set up for Single Game slates, what I would do is say I was making 100 lineups, I would make 60 lineups with a rule saying that the QB’s couldn’t be in the same lineup. I would then run 40 with both QB’s locked in. This gives you a good mix of lineups.

Summary:

Here are a couple key points that you should remember:

1. For the Captain Slot of Draftkings don’t be afraid to pay down. WR on the favorite is my first play to look at, followed by RB and then a much lower percentage of QB.
2. The exact opposite is true on Fanduel. I want the majority of my lineups to have QB in the MVP slot, followed by RB and then WR last.
3. Always Correlate your QB with a pass catcher. Never Naked QB.
4. Defense is a better punt on DK, Kickers on Fanduel
5. TEs are great salary savings on FD and have been in the optimal lineup over 60% of the time.
6. Pass catching RB’s even if they aren’t the bell cow back are great plays on DK when you can get them at a salary savings.
7. The captain salary on Draftkings for GPP winners has been $11,113

Showdown Player Pool

In this section, I’ll show you my player pool and my anticipated exposure to each player. In some cases, I’ll provide short notes about why I like a player. I’ll break down who my captains are for DK and who my MVP’s are for Fanduel as they are different, and then the rest of the player pool I’ll be using.

Captain – Draftkings:

Adam Thielen – WR Vikings: 20% Love Thielen, especially in PPR. He has been somewhat quiet for a few weeks, but I think he breaks out on the road here.

Russell Wilson – QB Seahawks: 20% Safe play given his consistency.

Dalvin Cook – RB Vikings: 20% The Vikings HAVE to establish the run and Cook has shown that he can be involved in the passing game as well.

Kirk Cousins – QB Vikings: 15% GPP play for me, as he will likely go underowned. Has huge ceiling but not much floor.

Stefon Diggs – WR Vikings: 10% Could flip flop him and Thielen and I wouldn’t be mad. Both studs, with great opportunities here in a must win game.

Tyler Lockett- WR Seahawks: 10% Remember that line  “Crabcakes and Football, that’s what Maryland Does” from Wedding Crashers? Well if Lockett was in that movie it would be ‘Long receptions and Touchdowns, thats what Ty Lockett Does” It’s literally all he does. Won’t get you a ton of PPR points but he can bust one.

Chris Carson – RB Seahawks: 5% Don’t love this play but the Seahawks love to run the ball. Should get enough volume if he somehow ends up in the endzone twice, he will be the optimal captain. Savings let you pay for pretty much everyone else.

Flex – Draftkings:

Doug Baldwin – WR Seahawks: If he plays you need to get some exposure to him.

David Moore – WR Seahawks 

Kyle Rudolph – TE Vikings 

Rashaad Penny – RB Seahawks: Injured, but if he plays you should get some exposure in GPP as he can blow up. More of a FD play for me.

Aldrick Robinson – WR Vikings: Love him here as he had 9 targets last game taking over for Laquon Treadwell as the #3 WR on this team.

Mike Davis – RB Seahawks: If Penny is out you can fire him up as he should see around 10 carries.

Latavius Murray – RB Vikings: Essentially just spells Cook at this point not someone I’m really interested in.

Nick Vannett – TE Seahawks: Have more interest in Dickson at his price and production recently, but Vannett is viable.

Jaron Brown – WR Seahawks: Deep GPP play, but he has caught 5 TD’s this year.

Ed Dickson – TE Seahawks: My favorite cheap play of the night. Has ran more routes than Vannett and played more snaps in two of the last three weeks.

Seahawks D

Vikings D 

Sebastian Janikowski – K Seahawks 

Dan Bailey – K Vikings

MVP – Fanduel 

I like to keep my MVP core really tight over here and typically we look at about 45% of QB’s and 45% RB’s in this spot for the optimal lineup.

Russell Wilson – QB Seahawks 30% 

Kirk Cousins – QB Vikings 25% 

Dalvin Cook – RB Vikings 25% 

Adam Thielen/Stefon Diggs 20% – Pick one or split this. I like them both to have big games here

Carson is viable as well, but that split backfield makes me a little nervous about him in MVP.

Flex – Fanduel

Tyler Lockett- WR Seahawks

Chris Carson – RB Seahawks

Doug Baldwin – WR Seahawks: If he plays you need to get some exposure to him.

David Moore – WR Seahawks 

Kyle Rudolph – TE Vikings 

Rashaad Penny – RB Seahawks: Injured, but if he plays you should get some exposure in GPP as he can blow up. More of a FD play for me.

Aldrick Robinson – WR Vikings: Love him here as he had 9 targets last game taking over for Laquon Treadwell as the #3 WR on this team. SUPER CHEAP ON FD

Mike Davis – RB Seahawks: If Penny is out you can fire him up as he should see around 10 carries.

Latavius Murray – RB Vikings: Essentially just spells Cook at this point not someone I’m really interested in.

Nick Vannett – TE Seahawks: Have more interest in Dickson at his price and production recently, but Vannett is viable.

Jaron Brown – WR Seahawks: Deep GPP play, but he has caught 5 TD’s this year.

Ed Dickson – TE Seahawks: My favorite cheap play of the night. Has ran more routes than Vannett and played more snaps in two of the last three weeks.

Sebastian Janikowski – K Seahawks 

Dan Bailey – K Vikings

Showdown Cash Game Strategy: 

In cash games, you want the safest floor possible. I think its really easy to build cash game lineups on DK for this game and not so much on FD. You don’t need to crush, you just need to cross that cash line. For me, that means sometimes rostering both QB’s and both defenses if it’s going to be low scoring. On DK I think that we play a safe guy like Thielen in Captain.  Pair him with Cousins and Wilson and then plug in kickers and other cheap options or even a defense. On Fanduel, Cousins or Wilson in MVP, Dalvin Cook, and then whatever floor plays you can find. I like Aldrick Robinson as a cheap play to open up some salary here.

Final Thoughts: